whatsbest1 editors select and review products independently. If you buy through affiliate links, we may earn commissions, which help support our testing.— that referral doesn’t cost you a penny -Disclosure page

In this essay, I’ll go through the top web hosting services in terms of speed. In addition, I’ve added a tutorial that explains why website speed is important and what characteristics show that the site is quick.

I feel the desire for speed—the need for speed— Tom Cruise’s Maverick spoke this statement in 1986 while flying around in a fighter aircraft. But this is the twenty-first century. So, obviously, we’re murmuring this while trying to load a website. This shows how important it is to choose fast web hosting for people who want to build websites.

You’re probably aware that speed is essential to the success of your website. However, if you’re anything like me, having it pointed out in this manner is enough to cause a panic attack. This is, of course, followed by a frenzied dash to get the quickest web hosting.

However, here is where you will encounter a major stumbling block.

Almost every provider will beat its chest and proclaim that it provides the quickest web hosting. That’s really weird, as today’s youngsters would say. It also makes it harder to find suppliers that genuinely provide high-speed web hosting.

Here’s where I come in.

I’ve put up a series of tests to see how the market’s most popular suppliers fare. And, after much deliberation and elimination, I’ve narrowed the list down to the top 5 companies that provide the quickest web hosting. Here’s how they compare:

Listed below are the top five fastest web hosting services.

  • Hostinger is the greatest web hosting provider in terms of price and performance
  • InMotion Hosting is the quickest web hosting service for small enterprises.
  • Cloudways provides the quickest VPS hosting for enterprises.
  • WP Engine is a WordPress-only web hosting service that is quick and easy to use.

If you’re not sure what metrics to consider when analyzing a website’s speed, I’ve included a quick explanation at the conclusion of this post.

1. Hostinger

Features Free SSL, CDN, LiteSpeed Web Server
TTFB 207ms
Page speed 936ms
Best for The cheapest speed-oriented provider

Hostinger has completely dominated the hosting industry. The company seems to have it all: low costs, resource-rich plans, and several optimizations to help your website load faster. There’s just one question: are these boasts only a smart way of enticing clients, or do they truly give speed at such a cheap price?

Despite its low costs, Hostinger is one of the market’s most performance-oriented providers. The host has a surprising number of performance-enhancing features.

  • Hostinger makes it simple to combat latency by providing 7 server locations. The loading time of your website will increase if the server where it “lives” is located far away from the visitor. This is due to the fact that data must travel a significant distance. To avoid this, you may choose from Brazil, Indonesia, the United Kingdom, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Singapore, or the United States. Unfortunately, only the final four choices are available for shared hosting.
  • The service provider provides many Hypertext Preprocessor (PHP) versions (from 5.2 to 8). Simply defined, this is the programming language that your website employs. You may somewhat speed up your website by selecting the most recent accessible version.
  • The LiteSpeed Web Server Hostinger’s server can handle more visitors while using fewer resources thanks to this technique. It’s also better prepared to deal with abrupt traffic increases.
  • Cache by LiteSpeed. This is a plugin that is pre-installed on WordPress sites. It saves copies of your website or its content in order to provide a faster delivery to returning visitors. It should result in faster page load times for your website.

So, how does Hostinger do with all of these speed boosters? Spoiler alert: it’s quite excellent.

Largest Contentful Paint (LCP) takes just 849ms, which is far below Google’s 2.5s restriction. So we’re all set there. But how about the whole loading time? Exhale a sigh of relief since it just takes 936ms. far short of the feared recommended time limit of three seconds

In terms of server responsiveness (TTFB), Hostinger comes in at 207ms, which is exactly what I wanted.

But, will Hostinger be able to manage the volume of traffic? There’s only one way to find out. So I send 50 VUs to my test website… and Hostinger handles it flawlessly.

The server response time (blue line) remains constant as the number of visitors grows (gray line). There are a few increases, but for the most part, it remains calm and unconcerned by the increased guests.

Overall, I like Hostinger’s extensive speed-boosting tools. Even better, it passes all of my tests.

Hostinger Costs

Hostinger offers three plans: Single ($2.59/month), Premium ($2.59/month), and Business ($3.99/month).

That’s incredibly inexpensive, particularly for a respected supplier with decent features and services.

All options include a free SSL certificate, weekly backups, and at least one email account. Here’s what you can anticipate from each plan separately:

  • Single-site Single ($1.39/mo) provides for the hosting of one website with 30GB of SSD storage and bandwidth for ten thousand monthly visitors.
  • Premium ($1.99 per month) includes 100 websites, 100GB of SSD storage, and bandwidth for 25K monthly views.
  • Business ($3.99/month) includes 200GB of SSD storage, bandwidth for 100,000 monthly visitors, a free CDN, and daily backups.

Premium is the package that provides the most value for money. For less than thrice the price, you get three times the resources of the starter plan. Choose the 4-year paying period if you want to obtain the greatest pricing.

Overall, Hostinger’s three plans provide outstanding value for money. Especially when such excellent achievement is at stake.

Hostinger is one of the best solutions for individuals seeking the fastest web hosting since it is inexpensive, quick, and filled with performance boosters.

Pros

  • Low-cost pricing
  • There are seven data center possibilities.
  • Outstanding performance
  • Comprehensive speed-up features.

Cons

  • There is no free domain for the basic plan.
  • Certain server locations are solely dedicated to cloud hosting

3. InMotion Hosting

Features Free SSL, emails, security features, UltraStack
TTFB 140ms
Page speed 825ms
Best for Fast and secure website hosting

InMotion Hosting, a veteran in the market, is a popular alternative for many, particularly those with small enterprises. While the provider’s cost is on the higher end, it compensates with speed and substantial resources.

Originally, InMotion Hosting claimed to offer the “fastest shared hosting experience imaginable,” even promising improved performance and speed.Its most notable feature is possibly its proprietary UltraStack system. UltraStack includes NGINX proxy caching, PHP FastCGI Process Manager (PHP-FPM), and Brotli Compression, all included in UltraStack.

Here are a few additional techniques and procedures that the company uses to ensure fast hosting:

  • N+2 or N+1 power systems.
  • BGP4 network to avoid downtime.
  • SSD hosting on Linux, N+1 on RAID 5 servers.

This is all becoming extremely complex. But, at the end of the day, all of the aforementioned software and hardware are designed to increase the performance of your website. So, of course, I had to do some experiments to see if InMotion’s boasts were true or simply hot air.

On the other hand, InMotion has every right to boast. If you want to rank better, or at all, on Google’s search results page, Google recommends staying below 2.5 seconds. The LCP takes only 663 ms with InMotion, giving you plenty of breathing room. Furthermore, it is the quickest of the providers on our list.

But, of course, I’m interested in how my InMotion test website performs for visitors as well as search engines. A loading time of less than 3 seconds would significantly improve a visitor’s user experience.

Well, I’m delighted to inform you that there’s no reason to be concerned. My InMotion site passed with flying colors, clocking up at just 825 ms of fully loaded time.

Finally, I did a stress test to put those InMotion constraints to the test and see how well they handle traffic.

So I sent 50 people to my website. This may appear small, but it is important to put it into context. See, 50 visits every minute still equates to tens of thousands of monthly visitors.

Regardless, InMotion manages the traffic with ease. There are some flaws, but the site’s response time (blue line) stays essentially unaffected when the number of visitors (gray line) increases.

Overall, InMotion has wowed us with its quickness and capacity to handle high traffic. I have no issues with how fast and reliable they are.

Pricing for InMotion Hosting is

Core ($2.29/mo), Launch ($4.99/mo), Power ($4.99/mo), and Pro ($12.99/mo) are the four shared hosting plans offered by InMotion.

To begin with, all of the plans provide ample resources and features. Free SSL certificates, free email addresses, free migration, and unlimited bandwidth are all included.

  • The Core ($2.29/mo) comes with two websites, 100 GB of SSD storage, and ten email accounts.
  • Launch ($4.99/month) allows you to connect to an infinite number of websites and provides an unlimited amount of NVMe SSD storage and email addresses.
  • Power ($4.99/month) includes everything from the Launch plan as well as sophisticated caching.
  • Pro ($12.99/month) includes everything in the Power package, plus a 99.99 percent SLA uptime guarantee and dedicated IP.

I’d recommend the Launch plan for the greatest value. You may host an infinite number of websites here and get a plethora of features and resources. Simultaneously, the renewal rates are significantly lower than with the power plan.

In conclusion, while InMotion’s pricing is slightly more than the cheapest hosting solutions, you receive a lot of resources for the money.

In summary, unless you simply require a small personal website, InMotion Hosting’s cost is pretty expensive. However, the provider is highly liberal with its server capacity, making it a worthwhile investment, particularly for small enterprises.

Pros

  • very fast loading time
  • It handles traffic well and well. Generous server resources.

Cons

  • Data centers with premium pricing are only available in the United States.

4. Cloudways

Features Free SSL, many server and location choices, built-in cache
TTFB 155ms
Page speed 914ms
Best for Fast VPS hosting for bigger projects

Cloudways isn’t a household name, but it’s growing in popularity. It is a one-of-a-kind company that installs and manages servers from leading VPS hosting providers. It’s an excellent choice for small-to-medium-sized commercial websites with complex requirements.

If you’re new to the world of web hosting, you may not have heard of Cloudways. However, the company has created a name for itself by providing a popular service.

  • Essentially, it makes VPS services much more accessible by simplifying the configuration and maintenance of numerous VPS servers. This covers well-known providers such as Amazon Web Services, DigitalOcean, Google Cloud, Linode, and Vultr.
  • That’s all well and good, but you’re probably more interested in how it got a position on the fastest web hosting list. To begin with, Cloudways is no slouch when it comes to performance-enhancing features.
  • The following are some of the services offered by the provider:
  • All servers include dedicated resources, SSD drives, and PHP-FPM to minimize page load times, as well as built-in caches with options like Memcached, NGINX, Redis, or Varnish to accelerate things.
  • There are several data center sites to select from. Your options are determined by the server provider you select. The options range from 8 to 20.

And my experiments show that these features are actually useful and aren’t simply for show.

My test site took 759 ms for LCP. Not the best on the list, but still in the top three, which is quite an accomplishment given the level of the providers on the list.

In addition, I’m relieved that the TTFB is considerably under 200 ms, at just 155 ms. That is rather remarkable.

And, by now, you’ve undoubtedly figured out that I have to mention its loading time. Well, I’ll say it with a smile because the fully loaded time is a quick 914 ms.

The final obstacle for Cloudways is a stress test to assess how well it manages traffic. Surprisingly, the supplier clears it flawlessly.

Even as the gray line (visitors) rises, the blue line (representing speed) remains almost entirely straight. There are a few little swings (down, of all things), but this is quite natural. There is no stopping the Cloudways train. In fact, I’d say this is one of the most faultless stress tests I’ve ever witnessed. So much so that I’m considering framing the graph.

Cloudways’ overall performance is textbook. I’d give the provider an A+ for speed, stability, and exceptional traffic management.

Cloudways Costs

  • Cloudways offers a plethora of plans. The cheapest is $10.00 per month, while the most expensive is $5000 per month.
  • DigitalOcean, Linode, and Vultr are on the low end. Meanwhile, Google Cloud and AWS are at the top of the scale.

The cheapest plans for each provider are displayed below. This provides a decent view of how various suppliers compare in terms of pricing.

While the price is a tad high, keep in mind that you’re paying for convenience. You pay a bit more for Cloudways to handle things like server setup, deployment, and administration on your behalf. Given the complexities of the situation, that’s not a bad price to pay.

More significantly, with this supplier, scalability is at your fingertips. You can add and subtract resources as you see fit, and at the end of the month, you only pay for what you’ve used.

If you run a smaller or less resource-intensive website, you’ll generally get the most bang for your buck with the lowest DigitalOcean package. It is only $10.00 per month and there are no renewal fees.

To put it succinctly, Cloudways is expensive for your money. However, in exchange, the service provides excellent resources and invaluable ease.

Overall, Cloudways offers a lot to the table, particularly its fast and dependable performance. If you’re ready to spend, it’s one of the greatest solutions for the quickest web hosting.

Pros

  • Faster and more reliable performance
  • Comprehensive speed-up features.
  • There are several server sites (depending on the server provider).

Cons

  • Pricing for high-end products
  • Many services are extra-cost.

5. WP Engine

Features Free SSL, CDN, managed WordPress, Google Cloud, and AWS servers
TTFB 140ms
Page speed 1.1s
Best for Premium and fast managed WordPress hosting

If you’re seeking the fastest managed WordPress hosting, WP Engine should be at the top of your list. Despite its high price, the WordPress-only service doesn’t have a hard time attracting a lot of people because of its lightning-fast performance and useful tools.

With WP Engine’s expensive cost, you may find it difficult to fit it into your budget. But, to be honest, I believe it’s a risk worth taking if you need fast web hosting.

For starters, WP Engine has a slew of precautions in place to keep things moving quickly. This includes the following:

WP Engine uses Google Cloud and AWS servers, so you can be confident that you’re getting the most up-to-date and fastest hardware for your site.

The WP Engine goes above and beyond what is anticipated to combat latency. The service provides 20 data center alternatives throughout the world.

exclusive caching technique (Evercache).

WP Engine features a free CDN to improve the speed of your site. This ensures that your material is distributed globally for quick and easy access.

Because the company specializes in managed WordPress hosting, it can make a lot of changes and automatically update your WordPress site to make it run as quickly as possible.

If they don’t work, all of the above are merely assertions. Fortunately, my experiments reveal that WP Engine more than lives up to its promises.

First, have a look at its LCP, which takes only 938 ms. That’s not the fastest we’ve seen so far, but it’s still quite quick. Furthermore, 938 ms still puts you in Google’s good graces because the search engine deems everything up to 2.5 s to be good.

Meanwhile, the TTFB and fully loaded times for my WP Engine test site are 140 ms and 1.1 s, respectively. Both outcomes are great. Here, the servers are responsive, and my visitors can access the site immediately. As a result, I have no problems.

WP Engine has passed all of my tests thus far, but there is one more to go: a stress test to assess how it handles a traffic increase. So I sent 50 VUs to my site. This might potentially add up to more than 40,000 monthly visitors—no small fry.

Well, it looks like WP Engine’s most basic plan is unable to handle 50 VUs. To be fair, the supplier stated unequivocally that the package is only intended to accommodate up to 25,000 visits. So I’m hoping for the best.

It’s time for me to rethink my expectations. And, after some trial and error, I discovered that it can take 30 VUs just as well.

As the gray line (number of visits) rises, the blue line (speed) remains flat and steady, which is what we desire. Furthermore, the red line (failures) is precisely where it should be: at the bottom.

After all, it appears that WP Engine keeps its word.

Finally, when it comes to performance, WP Engine checks all the boxes. This is a winner since it is fast and capable of handling traffic.

Pricing for WP Engine is

WP Engine has four pre-built plans: Startup ($22.50/month), Professional ($44.25/month), Growth ($86.25/month), and Scale ($217.50/month).It also comes with a custom plan, which costs more or less depending on how many changes you make.

WP Engine’s pricing is clearly much higher than those of its competitors. As a result, this is the price you’ll have to pay if you want to use features like GeoTarget and Evercache.

Startup ($22.50/month) provides 1 site, 10 GB of storage, 50 GB of bandwidth, and up to 25,000 monthly visitors.

  • Professional ($44.25/month) comes with three sites, 15GB of storage, 200GB of bandwidth, and 75,000 visitors each month.
  • Growth ($86.25/month) has 20GB of storage, 200GB of bandwidth, and the ability to host 10 websites with up to 100,000 monthly visits.
  • Scale ($217.50 per month) offers 50GB of storage, 500GB of bandwidth, 30 websites, and 400,000 monthly visitors.

Choose Startup if you have a tiny business. With its numerous features and support, it provides excellent value for money. However, if you’re creating websites for clients, Scale is unquestionably the better option.

Overall, WP Engine’s costs may be prohibitively expensive. However, it provides tremendous value and has the potential to be worth its weight in gold if used properly.

Overall, WP Engine, with its exceptional performance, is a hidden gem for those prepared to invest in fast web hosting.

Pros

Excellent performance.

Comprehensive speed-up features.

A plethora of premium features

Cons

Pricing for high-end products

The most basic plan can only manage 30 VUs.

Final suggestions for the fastest web hosting

While every provider will proclaim from the rooftops how quick and strong they are, only a handful will truly follow through. However, after extensive testing, five stood up to the task and proved to be just as fast as they promised.

So, here’s a brief rundown of each provider’s advantages:

  • Hostinger is the most affordable shared hosting company with a plethora of performance-enhancing features.
  • InMotion Hosting is the fastest growing shared hosting company for small companies.
  • Cloudways is a virtual private server (VPS) service that focuses on speed, flexibility, and stability.
  • For the quickest site hosting, WP Engine is the finest WordPress-focused company.

Choosing a Reliable Web Hosting Company

To be honest, there are a plethora of excellent companies that provide quick web hosting. To get to these treasures, you must first grasp why speed is important, what to look for, and, of course, what exactly is deemed quick.

So let’s have a look at it.

What is the significance of speed?

There’s a reason why so many service providers are ready to boast that they’re the quickest on the market. This is because they are fully aware that speed has a far-reaching impact on a website’s success. Search engine rankings and user experience are two of the most affected.

Ranking in search engines

The necessity of speed has long been emphasized by search engines. In reality, Google began incorporating page experience into its ranking systems in mid-June 2021. Furthermore, the page experience is heavily influenced by speed.

Furthermore, Google stated in 2010 that it takes website load speed into account when ranking a website. Furthermore, the search engine announced its speed upgrade in 2018, which makes website speed a ranking criteria for mobile queries as well.

Here’s what you can take away: even if you have a killer website with killer content, there’s a good chance it won’t get any attention if it’s slow.

The user experience

User experience (UX) refers to how a visitor interacts with and perceives your website. It takes various factors into account, including speed.

Simply said, a website with a strong UX will rapidly deliver users what they’re searching for. In terms of the concept of “fast,” it’s literally in the blink of an eye. Anything longer will result in a significant bounce rate on your site.

This is the proportion of visitors that exited (or bounced) without taking any action. This is obviously not ideal because you want your visitors to click on a link, fill out a contact form, visit other pages, and so on.

In any event, I could go on and on about why speed is important. But, because words are cheap, here are actual statistics to back it up:

Now that you understand why speed is important, let’s speak about what to look for when it comes to speed and what is actually deemed quick.

What elements influence the speed of your website?

When looking for the quickest website hosting company, there are a few things to keep an eye out for. Large Contentful Paint (LCP), time to first byte (TTFB), and completely loaded time are three of the most essential.

Let’s go a bit further and look at each of them individually:

The Most Contented Paint (LCP)

The length of time it takes to load and show the greatest piece of material to visitors is measured in LCP. The biggest chunk is commonly made up of text blocks or pictures, such as a hero image or a video.

I noted before that Google uses page experience as part of their ranking methodology. LCP is one of the three core web vitals that influence the page experience.

As a result, LCP has a say in your search engine optimization (SEO) results.

What constitutes a good LCP score, you may wonder? So, according to Google’s big brother,

  • Everything up to 2.5s is considered an excellent result. This is the goal you should aim for.
  • Anything between 2.5 and 4 might be improved.
  • Anything beyond 4s is considered bad.

Simply put, if you keep your files light, you should have no trouble with a huge LCP.

It’s time for the first byte (TTFB).

TTFB assesses the responsiveness of the provider’s server. While LCP is on your shoulders, the stats below merely show the provider’s side of things.

In layman’s terms, rapid TTFB indicates that the user’s request to open a website was transmitted and acknowledged by the server quickly.

Several factors might have an influence on this metric:

  • If the server is older, its performance (also known as responsiveness) will most likely be slower.
  • At the same time, a high TTFB may indicate that the visitors are located far from the server where the website is kept. As a result, the data must travel a great distance to and from the server. That will take time.
  • Ideally, your TTFB should be less than 200 ms. Anything between that and 600 ms is still a good bet. However, if you’re looking at close to 1, you’ll need to improve quickly.

Time to be Fully Loaded (FLT)

At the risk of repeating myself, this is the time it takes for your site to fully load. It truly is as easy as it sounds. That’s all. When the tiny circle at the top of the search engine stops spinning, you’re done. Your whole material is now available for consumption.

So, when is the best time? How long can your website last before it becomes unmanageable?

Anything that fits inside three seconds is regarded as a very excellent outcome. Of course, the faster it is, the better, but 3 seconds is the maximum suggested time. You may be wondering who is endorsing it. Google has claimed that websites that load in less than three seconds have a better chance of ranking higher on its search engine’s result page. This makes it simpler for newcomers to find your material even if they aren’t particularly looking for it.

Overall, even if you have a fantastic website with exciting animations and outstanding information, users will abandon it if it does not load quickly. So, keep your material light and as relevant to your target demographic as possible, and you should be OK.

FAQs about the fastest web hosting

What is the fastest WordPress hosting available?

SiteGround provides the quickest WordPress hosting. The service performs exceptionally well in testing, with its most contentful paint (LCP) measuring when the page’s largest content is shown taking just 711 ms.

Why is fast hosting important?

Fast hosting is critical since it influences user experience, search ranking, conversion, and other factors. It is one of the most important factors in how well your website does.

Is my website loading fast?

If your website meets specific criteria, it is called “quick.” Its LCP should be less than 2.5 s and its fully loaded time should be less than 3 s. Meanwhile, its TTFB should preferably be less than 200 ms. You may use Google PageSpeed Insights or GTMetrix to test the speed of your site.